A
form of play that emphasizes the absurdity of human existence by employing
disjointed, repetitious, and meaningless dialogue, purposeless and confusing
situations, and plots that lack realistic or logical development.
Martin
Esslin wrote a book titled “Theatre of the Absurd” that was published in year
1961. It dealt with the dramatists who belonged to a movement called “Absurd
Theater” though it was not regular. Samuel Beckett was one of those dramatists
who had largest contribution in “Absurd Theater”. His play “Waiting for Godot”
also belonged to the same category and was called absurd play.
The Theatre of the Absurd is a designation
for particular plays of absurdist fiction written by a number of primarily
European playwrights in the late 1950s, as well as one for the style of theatre
which has evolved from their work. Their work expresses the belief that human
existence has no meaning or purpose and therefore all communication breaks
down. In an absurd drama human condition is shown as meaningless. There are
disjoined, meaningless dialogue, and incomprehensible behavior. In an absurd drama
plot has no logical or realistic development.
Beckett's Waiting for Godot is an allegorical
absurd play. There is no particular time and place in the play. It reveals the
despair, nothingness, frustration of the post-war generation and its appeal
becomes bitter as the plots are established on a false imagination. The play
actually is full of nothingness, restless tiredness and childish fun. The for-nothing waiting of the
characters and their activities give the play a rich tone of absurdity.
An absurd work is a frightening one. It has
in itself no norms, no absolutes, no consoling certainties and no direction, It
simply exists. Nothing and nobody living in it has any pre-ordained scene or
purpose. The absurd dramatists are all concerned with the failure of
communication of the modem humanity which leaves man alienated. They are also
concerned with the lack of individuality and the over emphasis on conformity in
our society.
Characterization and characteristics of a
play are not drawn and seen in Waiting for Godot. Conflict and collision of
characters, psychological and inner suffering and developments of characters,
turning point of any particular event and fascinating dialogues are the
important characteristics of a play which are not found in this play. Instead
of it, the play goes through nothingness with false wish which is a new trend
in drama and it is absurdity.
The play starts with the waiting for Godot.
We do not know what or who the Godot is. Two passers-by - Estragon and Vladimir
wait for Godot when the play comes to an end. The time-difference of the play
is just one day and there are two acts in it. But it seems to us that time has
become stopped; the including characters cannot remember anything; even, they
cannot identify the same place. This absurdity, uncertainty and the destruction
of time and place show the meaninglessness of human existence. The opening
statement of Estragon is very significant: "Nothing to be done."
In Waiting for Godot, we observe the use of
symmetry in the incidents. We meet Pozzo and Lucky in each of two acts before
the presence of the boy. In every case, we get the boy-messenger who says that
the Godot will not go that day; he will go the day after. Symmetry is
everywhere in the drama- inwardly and outwardly - which is an important
characteristic of an absurd play. The stage itself is divided into two parts
and the tree is in the middle. Symmetry is also presented as an opposite
ideology in the play. In Act-I, we hear a long lecture of Lucky; hard to get,
but suggestive And in Act-II, we get Lucky as disabled, he can't speak.
In the play, we see another absurd feature, the half comic-grotesque. Comic tone is heard from the very beginning i.e. to catch the boot, to see something by the cap etc. In the last scene the falling down of Estragon's trouser is very comic though the desire is to commit suicide where there is no scope of fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment